3. In writing, compare and contrast the information in Johnson’s speech with that found in the Pentagon Papers and support or refute the thesis: There was indeed a credibility gap in the government’s public portrayal of the conflict in Vietnam. You must provide at least 3 examples to support your view. These examples must point to specific language in both the speech and the Pentagon Papers quotations.

One paragraph Despite no scientific or empirical data to support the trait approach to leadership, many still believe there is an association between leadership behavior and certain traits. Research and cite your responses to the following questions: Why do you think these beliefs persist? In what ways is the use of the trait approach helpful and/or harmful to those who use it? One paragraph What are the similarities and differences of oral and written communication? What kinds of situations call for the use of oral methods? What situations call for the use of written communication? One paragraph Sociologists stress that family life is not just a reflection of individual decisions but also the social structure of the broader society. Using concepts from this week’s reading to support your points, discuss how society shapes family life. One paragraph How would you define a religion? What characteristics must a belief system have in order for it to be considered a religion? If a belief system did not include faith, a God, heaven, or hell, would it still be a religion? How much of a belief system do you have to believe in order to be considered a member of a religion, 100%, 90%, less?
July 22, 2020
Rapid technological development in Oman
July 23, 2020

3. In writing, compare and contrast the information in Johnson’s speech with that found in the Pentagon Papers and support or refute the thesis: There was indeed a credibility gap in the government’s public portrayal of the conflict in Vietnam. You must provide at least 3 examples to support your view. These examples must point to specific language in both the speech and the Pentagon Papers quotations.

Pentagon Papers Assignment

Background

  This essay will be 2-3 pages. The term “credibility gap,” was made popular during the Johnson administration’s handling of the Vietnam conflict. The term refers to the growing distance between reality and official claims and statements from the White House about the conflict in Vietnam. Johnson’s credibility or trustworthiness was, as the war wore on, increasingly called into question by the American public. One major event that seemed to confirm this credibility gap was the release of the Pentagon Papers.    

Assignment

  1. Read Lyndon Johnson’s 1965 speech, “Why We Are in Vietnam.” Pay close attention to the central arguments Johnson offers his audience for why the United States is in Vietnam, as well as to his characterizations of U.S. enemies and allies. Johnson's speech, "Why We Are in Vietnam," on YouTube:  HYPERLINK "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9KJyiXzp34" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9KJyiXzp34 Full text: HYPERLINK "http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=27116"http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=27116   2. Read the excerpts from the Pentagon Papers. Pay attention to what these statements suggest about what is happening in Vietnam and why it is happening. For access to the full report: HYPERLINK "http://www.archives.gov/research/pentagon-papers/"http://www.archives.gov/research/pentagon-papers/   3. In writing, compare and contrast the information in Johnson’s speech with that found in the Pentagon Papers and support or refute the thesis: There was indeed a credibility gap in the government’s public portrayal of the conflict in Vietnam. You must provide at least 3 examples to support your view. These examples must point to specific language in both the speech and the Pentagon Papers quotations.   The following helpful quotations are excerpted from the U.S. Defense Department’s secret history of the Vietnam War, published as: The Pentagon Papers: The Defense Departments History of the United States Decisionmaking on Vietnam: 1945-1967, 5 vols. (Boston: Beacon Press, 1971, 1972). Full text of the report is available athttp://www.archives.gov/research/pentagon-papers/.   “In 1956, almost any type of election that could conceivably be held in Vietnam would, on the basis of present trends, give the Communists a very significant if not decisive victory.”   “Nationalist appeal in Vietnam is so closely identified with Ho Chi Minh and the Viet-Minh movement, even in areas outside communist control, candidates and issues connected with ‘nationalism’ and supported by the Viet-Minh would probably be supported by the majority of people.”   “South Vietnam (unlike other countries in Asia) was essentially the creation of the United States.”   “The CIA official in Saigon (South Vietnam), Edward Lansdale, described the government of South Vietnam in the late 1950’s as an ‘emerging fascist state.’”   “In 1964, the CIA, the State Department, and Defense Intelligence Agency believed that the primary sources of communist strength in South Vietnam are indigenous*.”   “In 1965, the President of South Vietnam, President Thieu, according to George Ball (State Department official), believed that, ‘the communists could still win any election held in South Vietnam.’”   4. You should also use supporting material from the course readings, esp. George Herring, The Longest War.”   5. As you frame your analysis, keep in mind that Johnson made this speech in 1965 and left office in 1968. The Pentagon Papers were not released until 1971. For real-time news coverage of the events, consult the databases of the UMUC library and NARA.gov.     *Indigenous means native or original. In this context, it means that most of the communists in South Vietnam were South Vietnamese, not North Vietnamese infiltrators.

Pentagon Papers Assignment

Background

 

This essay will be 2-3 pages. The term “credibility gap,” was made popular during the Johnson administration’s handling of the Vietnam conflict. The term refers to the growing distance between reality and official claims and statements from the White House about the conflict in Vietnam. Johnson’s credibility or trustworthiness was, as the war wore on, increasingly called into question by the American public. One major event that seemed to confirm this credibility gap was the release of the Pentagon Papers.

 

 

Assignment

 

1. Read Lyndon Johnson’s 1965 speech, “Why We Are in Vietnam.” Pay close attention to the central arguments Johnson offers his audience for why the United States is in Vietnam, as well as to his characterizations of U.S. enemies and allies.

Johnson’s speech, “Why We Are in Vietnam,” on YouTube:  HYPERLINK “http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9KJyiXzp34http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9KJyiXzp34

Full text: HYPERLINK “http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=27116http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=27116

 

2. Read the excerpts from the Pentagon Papers. Pay attention to what these statements suggest about what is happening in Vietnam and why it is happening.

For access to the full report: HYPERLINK “http://www.archives.gov/research/pentagon-papers/http://www.archives.gov/research/pentagon-papers/

 

3. In writing, compare and contrast the information in Johnson’s speech with that found in the Pentagon Papers and support or refute the thesis: There was indeed a credibility gap in the government’s public portrayal of the conflict in Vietnam. You must provide at least 3 examples to support your view. These examples must point to specific language in both the speech and the Pentagon Papers quotations.

 

The following helpful quotations are excerpted from the U.S. Defense Department’s secret history of the Vietnam War, published as: The Pentagon Papers: The Defense Departments History of the United States Decisionmaking on Vietnam: 1945-1967, 5 vols. (Boston: Beacon Press, 1971, 1972). Full text of the report is available athttp://www.archives.gov/research/pentagon-papers/.

 

“In 1956, almost any type of election that could conceivably be held in Vietnam would, on the basis of present trends, give the Communists a very significant if not decisive victory.”

 

“Nationalist appeal in Vietnam is so closely identified with Ho Chi Minh and the Viet-Minh movement, even in areas outside communist control, candidates and issues connected with ‘nationalism’ and supported by the Viet-Minh would probably be supported by the majority of people.”

 

“South Vietnam (unlike other countries in Asia) was essentially the creation of the United States.”

 

“The CIA official in Saigon (South Vietnam), Edward Lansdale, described the government of South Vietnam in the late 1950’s as an ‘emerging fascist state.’”

 

“In 1964, the CIA, the State Department, and Defense Intelligence Agency believed that the primary sources of communist strength in South Vietnam are indigenous*.”

 

“In 1965, the President of South Vietnam, President Thieu, according to George Ball (State Department official), believed that, ‘the communists could still win any election held in South Vietnam.’”

 

4. You should also use supporting material from the course readings, esp. George Herring, The Longest War.”

 

5. As you frame your analysis, keep in mind that Johnson made this speech in 1965 and left office in 1968. The Pentagon Papers were not released until 1971. For real-time news coverage of the events, consult the databases of the UMUC library and NARA.gov.

 

 

*Indigenous means native or original. In this context, it means that most of the communists in South Vietnam were South Vietnamese, not North Vietnamese infiltrators.


PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER AND GET HELP FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER:)

Click the button below to order this paper AND ENJOY OUR DISCOUNT.

E
E

Comments are closed.